CHENNAI:
Two
years after Meendum Manjapai campaign was launched by the state
government, a study has found that it has been effective in garnering
attention and in mainstreaming the issue of plastic pollution but it has
not been effective in achieving its objective - promoting cloth bags to
eliminate single use plastics.
The study conducted by Citizen
Consumer and Civic Action Group (CAG) among 1632 respondents spread
across eight districts in Tamil Nadu found that vendors find it
extremely challenging to switch to alternatives, primarily because of
customer demand for a free bag and the high-cost factor of alternatives.
"These deter them from transitioning and complying with the ban," the
report states.
The eight districts where the study was conducted
include Chennai, Coimbatore, Trichy, Madurai, Theni, Perambalur,
Nagapattinam and Kanyakumari. The districts were chosen primarily on the
basis of population size (highest and lowest population) and two
coastal districts were selected as part of the study since the
consequences of plastic pollution are most acutely felt in coastal
areas.
The study also said that most of the single use plastic
(SUP) bags did not bear any information on the microns, name and place
of manufacturer, etc. "This shows that there is an abundant supply of
SUP bags in the market which go unregulated. Some vendors also mentioned
that cloth bags are not suitable for their products such as flowers and
meat and therefore they do not have a choice but to use SUP bags," the
study stated.
The data collected from market vendors reveal that
irrespective of the geographic area and type of product, usage of SUP
bags is the norm and taking a cloth bag to shops is the exception. Many
vendors responded that even though they are aware of the dangers of
plastics, the cost of alternatives,
customer demand and peer pressure do not allow them to switch to alternative materials.
The
findings also point that the manjappai kiosks, albeit a great
initiative, have not reached people sufficiently. The machines are
available in very limited places, mostly in district headquarters. And
even if they are available, they are not maintained properlyas they are
rarely in working condition, the study stated.
The study says
that respondents expressed disappointment that the enforcement of SUP
ban focuses primarily on small vendors, and that it is unfair. They
added that the government needs to enforce the ban on big multinational
corporations as they are the major contributors of plastic pollution,
and continue using SUPs despite their capabilities and financial
resources to transition away.
The report statesd that regulating
mechanism for capping production should embody transparency and
accountability. To facilitate this, clear targets and timelines should
be set where progressive reduction of production of SUP is monitored.
This can be added to the existing interface in the Meendum
Manjappai
app, wherein list of name and place of manufacture of SUP, and the
quantum of and location from where SUP has been seized, and the amount
in fine collected from each manufacturer shall be displayed.
The
report is being released during Climate Action Month, 2024 (CAM), an
initiative by Citizen consumer and civic Action Groupm wherein a series
of events across the city will be launched during the month of August.
Dr Senthilkumar, Environment Secretary presided over the inaugural
meeting.
Saturday, August 3, 2024
Meendum Manjapai garnered attention but failed in its objective to eliminate single use plastics, says study
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment