C Shivakumar
Sources feel that it is not only the developer who has violated the
court order but even the bank which has rented the premises. “How can a bank
turn a blind eye to the fact that the building was earlier sealed and was
de-sealed by High court after the owner promised to bring down the structure.
They should have checked the status with CMDA,” a source said.
Chennai:
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority has vowed to reseal the
building after a developer violated a High Court order by failing to bring down
an unauthorized structure and renting out the premises to bank and other
establishments.
The building at plot number 922 and 923 in Bazaar Road, Madipakkam Main
Road in Ram Nagar extension in Madipakkam was sealed by Chennai Metropolitan
Development Authority on November 2013 for constructing it in contravention of
the approved plan.
Sources said the developer approached High Court on the pretext that it
be de-sealed so that he can bring down the illegal structure. The High Court in
its order allowed the developer to demolish the unauthorized structure but also
issued a directive to CMDA to inspect the building and confirm whether the
unauthorized structure is removed or not.
“In case the unauthorized structure is not removed within the given
time, CMDA is permitted to initiate further action in accordance with law,” the
High Court stated.
But far from removing the unauthorized structure in contravention of
High Court order and Town and Country Planning Act, the developer rented out
the premises to a bank.
Sources told Express that the developer had got approval for ordinary
building with stilt plus two floors, including one floor dedicated to tailoring
unit.
However, in contravention to the approved plan, he built an extra floor
besides converting the building into a commercial one. Interestingly, he also
amalgated both the plots into a single building without getting approval from
CMDA. This resulted in CMDA issuing lock and seal notice and later sealing the
building.
After the developer approached the court, CMDA desealed the building but
on condition that the building shall not be occupied for any purpose till CMDA
issues a letter.
But the builder neither took the permission of the High court or CMDA
and occupied the building and rented out the premises to a bank and other
establishment.
As per Town and Country Planning Act’s provision Section 56 (2), there
cannot be any further construction activity or usage of the building after lock
and seal notice is issued.
A CMDA official said CMDA is keeping a watch on every building that is
desealed. “We are aware of it and will be resealing the building after the
election code of conduct gets over,” said the official.
No comments:
Post a Comment